|

Ervin Nyiregyhazi, Pianist
Biography &
Obituaries
Recordings
Books
Movie
Appearances
Magazine Articles
(Coming Soon...)
Newspaper Articles
(Coming Soon...)
Published Reviews
Listen to Samples
Piano Rolls
The Messengers of Peace
-- NEW!
Images
Links
Subscribe
Contact the
Webmaster
Acknowledgements/
Credits
Support
Webmaster:
GrossWEB
Last edited:
18-Jul-2005
|
Ervin Nyiregyhazi, Pianist
Reviews
Please submit additional links to reviews by sending email to webmaster@nyiregyhazi.org.
Ervin Nyiregyhazi
Operatic Paraphrases
Ervin Nyiregyhazi, piano
VAI Audio VAI/IPA 1003 [ADD] (monaural) (55:29)
Here are some facts about pianist Ervin Nyiregyhazi (1903-1987), taken
in part from Gregor Benko's notes to this disc:
- As a little boy, his parents had servants cut his food and place it
in his mouth so he could keep his attention on less mundane matters.
- Some people claimed he was the literal reincarnation of Liszt.
- As an adult, he demonstrated a questionable ability to care for
himself. At times he was so poor (largely through mismanagement of his
money) that he was reduced to sleeping on subways.
- He was married ten times.
- As "Pianist X," he sometimes wore a leather mask in
performance. Pianos would suffer under his onslaught, and the pianos
he chose to play on often had as many nervous tics as the pianist did
(a parallel with Glenn Gould).
- For decades before this recording was made, Nyiregyhazi did not own
a piano, or even practice on one.
Perhaps the reader will not be surprised to hear that the two men whom
Nyiregyhazi idolized the most were Franz Liszt and Oscar Wilde.
These recordings were made in 1978 during a series of sessions for the
International Piano Archives. Material from these sessions was released on
Columbia LPs (apparently not transferred to CD), and at their release in
1980, critical and popular opinion was mixed and vociferous. Some people
didn't believe that any man could play so loudly, and it's true that
Nyiregyhazi might have been one of the loudest pianists of all time. That
would be a dubious distinction, however, and there's more to the
Nyiregyhazi legend than volume. The man was an eccentric, but he also was
a poet, and his playing shows him to have been a man of exquisite
refinement and a searching imagination.
There are six paraphrases on this disc: a Rienzi/Lohengrin
conflation, Un Ballo in Maschera, Il Trovatore, Otello,
Eugene Onegin, and I Pagliacci. Some are Lisztian
fantasies (the Trovatore paraphrase closely resembles Liszt's,
with its reliance on the "Miserere"), and others are more
straightforward medleys, although not necessarily of the operas' most
popular tunes. None of Nyiregyhazi's imaginative, stylish paraphrases seem
trivial, unless one has a deep-seated antipathy to this sort of thing. The
pianism is astonishing, considering the man's history, but it is not
note-perfect. It is informed with both power and an outstanding
timbral sensitivity, although these qualities are more obvious on the
Columbia Liszt LPs. The recording itself is only adequate -- this is
pianism that probably needs the very best in recorded sound to make its
full impact.
This is the kind of disc that might make you want to pull out your
Ouija board and burn a lot incense as you play it. Traditional it's not,
but it's an experience that you won't soon forget, whether your reaction
is positive or negative. I think that anyone with a strong interest in the
piano and pianists should hear Nyiregyhazi, and in the absence of the
Columbia LPs, this CD should do nicely.
Raymond Tuttle
<rtuttle@mwc.edu>
Copyright © Ray Tuttle, 1996.
Two Legendes by Franz
Liszt
Gordon Rumson
Greetings,
Recently I dug out some of my old Ervin
Nyiregyhazi recordings. The ones that astounded me most again were
the recordings of the Two Legendes by Franz Liszt.
In both cases Nyiregyhazi's
performances are so striking that other recordings pale in
comparison.
The first legend which is 'St. Francis
preaching to the birds' can sound terribly banal in the hands of
virtually all pianists. I heard the dullest performance of this in
Toronto by a 'famed Liszt performer' in the 80s. Every note was
perfectly in place, every trill was perfect and the result was a
blight. One wished for hunters to put the d*mned birds out of *our*
misery. The same goes for most of the recordings I have heard.
But, Nyiregyhazi. Ah. This is something
utterly beyond mere piano playing.
His trills are every bit as good as
anyone and yet his birds sound like the most widely variated flock
imaginable. A veritable Parliament of Birds. But he achieves this by
utter disregard of the bar line and pulse. You may think this a
horror, but it is perfect. As the pianist Nathan Perelman once said
"Who ever heard of birds who sing in time...?"
It is also in the sermon of the Saint that
Nyiregyhazi creates something remarkable. For those of us who have
sat through the average sermon the mere word conjures up boredom of
an infinite scale. But when a great preacher stands up it is
remarkable -- even for those of us who are not religious. Compared
to Nyiregyhazi's sermon no recording or performance comes close. His
Saint speaks with a transcendental eloquence -- and again with total
disregard for mere metre. But he SPEAKS! And we, like those
birds of legend, are compelled to listen. From a technical point of
view, Nyiregyhazi declaims the musical line and also listens very
carefully to the intervals between the notes, giving a powerful
tension to the sound.
The second Legende, different St. Francis,
different story (walking on the water) is given a stormy performance
that certainly has its share of 'wrong' notes, but who ever heard of
a tornado with its droplets nicely placed? This is music of surging
fury. It is given a performance by Nyiregyhazi that gives due credit
to the content. Yes, he tears through the music -- like a lightening
bolt.
Am I being to effusive? Well I suppose
enthusiasm is a bad thing. Especially in as academic a subject as
playing the piano...:))
I do not wish for pianists to try to imitate
the way Nyiregyhazi plays. BUT I do wish that we pianists could
learn that we should preserve ourselves and our audiences from
boring performances and never replace living music with mere
attention to detail as if minding our manners were the same as being
good humans or better artists. We ought to seek the inner meaning of
the music behind the facade of black dots. This might be heresy to
some, but then I'll accept the epithet. Nyiregyhazi's performances
prove, not that they are the ideal or only way to play (if
Nyiregyhazi applied at a music school he would not get in the door
-- but that tells us more about the school, than about Nyiregyhazi)
but that there is real music even when other things are ignored.
The ideal would be to catch what Nyiregyhazi
heard AND follow the score correctly and thoroughly.
All best wishes,
Gordon Rumson (pianistic heretic)
PS I've also always loved Paderewski's
performances. |